Icici Bank Ltd v. Guddu & ANR.

$-27, 28 & 31.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELIH AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.fC) 2364/2071 ICICI BANK LTD Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Kumar Bhalla, Advocate.

versus NARULA corporate RELOCATION SERVICES PVT LTD &ANR.

Respondents Through:

+ W.P.rCI 2365/2071 ICICI BANK LTD peti,ie„er Through:

Mr. Puneet Kumar Bhalla, Advocate, versus GUDDU & ANR.

Respondents Through:

+ W.P.rCI 2405/2021 ICICI BANK LTD Petitioner Through:

Mr. Puneet Kumar Bhalla, Advocate.

versus SACHIN YADAV & ANR.

Respondents Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI By:AMULYA

%

ORDER

22.02.2021 C.M. No.6904/2021. 6907/2021 & 7003/2021 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. <• The applications stand disposed of.

W.P.ra 2364/2021. 2365/2021 & 2405/2021 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not press these petitions and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the same. He, however,- submits that the costs imposed by the DRAT are excessive and, therefore, prays that the same may be reduced. While dismissing the petitions as withdrawn, the costs imposed upon the petitioner are reduced from Rs.50,000/- to Rs. 10,000/- in each case. The costs be deposited within four weeks from today. VIPIN S REKHA^PALLI, J FEBRUARY 22, 2021 B.S. Rohella