← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./726/2019

Manoj Kumar & ORS v. The State Of Govt Of NCT Delhi & ANR

2019-02-08Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 726/2019 and Crl. M.A. no. 2991/2019 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Parmil Kumar, Adv.

versus THE STATE OF GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR.... Respondents Through Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP with ASI Hawa Singh, P.S. Nihal Vihar Mr.

Anil Kumar, Adv.

with respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 08.02.2019 Notice.

Learned APP accepts notice for respondent no. 1.

Respondent no.2 Ms. Mamta Devi is present in Court along with respondent no. 2 and accepts notice. She has been identified by ASI Hawa Singh of police station Nihal Vihar.

Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with petitioner no. 1 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 20th March, 2017. Respondent no. 2 further submits that her marriage with petitioner no.1 has already been dissolved by a decree

of divorce by mutual consent dated 8th February, 2018 passed by the Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Petitioner no. 1 has paid `50,000/- to respondent no. 2, vide a cheque, photocopy whereof has been placed on record. Respondent no. 2 has accepted the said cheque towards balance settled amount, subject to its encashment. Respondent no. 2 says that entire settled amount of `2,00,000/- stands paid with this payment and she has no objection in case FIR no. 142/2011 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 4. Affidavit of respondent no. 2 to this effect is on record.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, , subject to encashment of the aforesaid cheque. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 08, 2019/r.bararia