Maa Bhagwati Degree College & ANR. v. National Council For Teacher Education & ANR.
$~84, 85, 87 & 88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3593/2026 MAA BHAGWATI DEGREE COLLEGE & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.
versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Kshitiz, Advs. for NCTE + W.P.(C) 3616/2026 HARISHCHANDRA MAHAVIDYALAYA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.
versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Kshitiz, Advs. Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, , Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms.
Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs for NCTE + W.P.(C) 3628/2026 JIUT DAS GIRLS COLLEGE & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.
versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, Mr. Shivom Sethi, Mr. Kshitiz, Advs. Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, , Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms.
Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs for NCTE The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
+ W.P.(C) 3654/2026 MAA BHAGVATI DEGREE COLLEGE & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Ray, Advs.
versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Shivom Sethi Mr. Nandeesh Nanda, , Mr. Kshitiz, Advs. for NCTE
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 23.03.2026 1.
These are writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:
"W.P.(C) 3593/2026 (i) issue a writ of mandamus ·or any other suitable writ, order or direction to the Respondents to process and decide petitioner's application for grant of recognition of D.El.Ed. course in time bound, manner; and/ or (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order of D.EL.ED. Course under Clause 7(16) of NCTE Regulations, 2014; ...
W.P.(C) 3616/2026 (i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
direction to the Respondents to process and decide petitioner's application for grant of recognition of B.Ed. course in time bound manner; and/or (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order 33 of B.ED. Course under Clause 7(16) of NCTE Regulations, 2014; ...
W.P.(C) 3628/2026 (i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction to the Respondents to process and decide petitioner's application for grant of recognition of B.Ed. course in time bound manner; and/or (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order deciding Petitioner's application for grant of final recognition _ of B.ED. Course under Clause 7(16) of NCTE Regulations, 2014;...
W.P.(C) 3654/2026 (i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction to the Respondents to process and decide petitioner, s application for grant of recognition of B.Ed. course in time bound manner; and/ or (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
of B.ED. Course under Clause 7(16) of NCTE Regulations, 2014; ..."
2.
For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice. 3.
Mr. Rupal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in W.P.(C) 3628/2026 and W.P.(C) 3616/2026.
4.
Mr. Kapoor, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in W.P.(C) 3654/2026 and W.P.(C) 3593/2026. 5.
Mr. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that petitioner's applications are pending with the respondents for a substantially long period of time and the same have neither been returned nor have been processed in terms of the decision taken in the 55th General Body Meeting of the respondent No. 1/NCTE.
6.
He further states that the petitioners have duly complied with all the procedural requirements as well as the extant rules. 7.
The petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to consider the pending applications of the petitioners in accordance with the 55th GBM Meeting and either return the same (if found not in accordance with the parameters) and in the alternative if found fulfilling the parameters, the same may be processed in accordance with their extant rules within 4 months from today.
JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 23, 2026/AS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.