Navjot Singh v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.
$~22 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: February 25, 2021 + CRL.M.C. 624/2021 & Crl.M.A. 3062/2021 NAVJOT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Surinder Singh, Advocate
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State with ASI Sohanvir Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 1.
Petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 429/2019, registered at police station Hari Nagar, New Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
2.
Notice issued.
3.
Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is the complainant of FIR in question and she is present through video Crl.M.C. 624/2021 Page 1 of 3
conferencing and has been identified by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing. 4.
With the consent of both the sides, present petition has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the subject matter of FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 18.02.2021. 6.
Respondent No. 2 present through video conferencing affirms the factum of settlement in terms of aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding dated 18.02.2021 as well as contents of her affidavit filed in support of this petition.
7.
Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.
8.
For the reasons afore-recorded FIR No. 429/2019, registered at police station Hari Nagar, New Delhi, registered at police station Hari Nagar, New Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
9.
The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of. Crl.M.C. 624/2021 Page 2 of 3
10.
Pending application also stands disposed of.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 25, 2021 r Crl.M.C. 624/2021 Page 3 of 3