Praneet Singh Taneja v. Union Of India

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1513/2019 PRANEET SINGH TANEJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Arora, Mr.Lakshay Raheja, Mr.Shivam Thapar, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr.Ajay Gupta, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms.Kirti Awasthi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 03.02.2020 The learned counsel for the respondent submits that by an Office Memorandum dated 31.12.2019, an amendment has been made in Clause 8(iii) of the Guidelines for Recognition/Renewal or Extension as an Approved Tourist Transport Operator (TTO) dated 18.07.2011.

In view of the amendment, the petition has been rendered infructuous and the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the same.

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. NAVIN CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 03, 2020 RN