Rohit @ Robin @ Bablu v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi Through Sho Ps Prashant Vihar
$~7 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 749/2025 ROHIT @ ROBIN @ BABLU .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Vishal Boora, Adv.
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO PS PRASHANT VIHAR .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC with Mr.
Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. with SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
% 12.03.2025 1.
This is a petition seeking grant of parole for a period of 30 days for taking better treatment and also to take care of the mother of the petitioner who requires urgent medical treatment.
2.
The petitioner has been convicted for offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentence to life imprisonment.
3.
As per the Nominal Roll dated 11.03.2025, the petitioner has already undergone 15 years 9 months 17 days of incarceration and has a remission of 2 years 11 months 29 days.
4.
As per the status report handed over in Court today, it is stated that on 28.09.2024, 05.10.2024 and 16.11.2024 the patient/petitioner was referred to GB Pant Hospital, Department of Neurology as a follow up case of O Old The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Stroke with left Sided Weakness, Left Hemeperasis with left LMN facial palsy with new onset of weakness, left facial weakness (LMN Type). Patient again had left Upper Limb and Lower Limb Hemeperasis after 15 days of visit, he was examined and advised fresh NCCT HEAD, MRI Brain with MR Angiography, Bilateral Carotid Doppler, Blood Investigations in view of newly developed weakness and advised to review with NCCT head and the same was done on 28.11.2024 which reveals no significant abnormality Ischemic changes. On 07.01.2025, the petitioner presented himself in dispensary and complained about left sided body numbness and weakness and chest pain.
5.
In this view, it seems that the petitioner is in need of urgent medical assistance and despite regular visits to the hospital there is no substantial improvement.
6.
Mr. Arya, learned counsel for the respondent states that in the past, the petitioner has jumped parole and hence opposes the grant of parole. 7.
Vide Order dated 07.06.2024, despite the petitioner having jumped parole in 2015, the petitioner was granted parole and surrendered late by 19 days. The late surrender by 19 days was on account of some confusion at the end of the petitioner. However, the fact is that the petitioner has self surrendered and was not arrested.
8.
Mr. Arya, learned counsel further states that there are 6 involvements of the petitioner in other cases.
9.
It is stated that out of 6 cases, the petitioner has been acquitted in 3 cases and in one case, the petitioner has already been granted bail and in another case, the appeal against the conviction is pending. Further in one FIR, the police station is not mentioned, hence, the same is not traceable. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
10.
I am of the view that the medical condition of the petitioner demands the urgent medical treatment. For the said reasons, I am inclined to allow the petition.
11.
Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 30 days from the date of his release subject to his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- and one Surety Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, further subject to the following conditions:- a) Petitioner shall provide mobile number to the 10 concerned which shall be kept in working condition at all times and he shall not change the mobile number without prior intimation to the Investigating Officer concerned.
b) Petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity. c) The petitioner will furnish his permanent address to the IO and in case he changes his address, he will inform the same to the IO concerned;
12.
Upon expiry of period of 30 days as stated above, the petitioner shall surrender before the concerned jail authorities. 13.
The status report handed over in Court today is taken on record. 14.
The petition is disposed of.
JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 12, 2025/DM Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.