Pushpa Malik v. Goverdhan Lal & ANR

$~57 & 58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 66/2020 PUSHPA MALIK .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus GOVERDHAN LAL & ANR .....Respondents Through:

None.

(58) + RC.REV. 68/2020 PUSHPA MALIK .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus ATUL KUMAR .....Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 13.01.2025 1.

None appears for the parties.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Respondents had appeared on the last date of hearing and informed the Court that the dispute between the parties has already been settled and that the keys of the tenanted premises have already been handed over by the Petitioner to the Respondents. 3.

The record shows that there was no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner on the last date of hearing as well. 4.

Quite clearly since the possession of the subject premises has been restored, the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. 5.

The Petitions are accordingly dismissed.

6.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J JANUARY 13, 2025/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 14:40:00