Chander Singh v. State

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 339/2020 CHANDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Karanjeet Sharma, Advocate with ASI Amarjeet Singh, P.S.: New Ashok Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 03.03.2020 Petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months for repair of his dilapidated house and to re-establish social ties. Status report filed. Nominal roll of the petitioner filed. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent/State submits that the present petition has become infructuous, as the petitioner has already been granted parole by the competent authority i.e. Dy. Secretary (Home), Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Home (General) Department, 5th Level, Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, Delhi. Heard. In view of the above submission, the present petition has become infructuous and stands disposed of accordingly. BRIJESH SETHI, J MARCH 03, 2020/savita