Piyush Anand v. Union Public Service Commission & ANR.

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3338/2024 & CM APPL. 13750-51/2024 PIYUSH ANAND ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Palash S Singhai, Advocate versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advocates for R-1/UPSC.

Ms. Avshverya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Mr. Shriram Tiwary, Ms.

Usha Jamnal, Nitin Agnihotri and Mr.

Salman Razi, Advocates for R-2/UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 05.03.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode) 1.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition to re-file the same before the learned, Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi.

2.

In view of the above, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal on the same cause of action without prejudice to his rights and contentions as available under law.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:41:01

3.

Learned Tribunal is requested to expeditiously take up the petition for hearing on urgent basis keeping in view the urgent reliefs prayed for. 4.

The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 5.

Dasti.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J MARCH 5, 2024 Aj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:41:01