Hari Singh v. State

$~65 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 338/2020 HARI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr K.

Singhal and Mr Chetan Bhardwaj, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr Karanjeet Sharma, Advocate along with SI Mahesh, PS Palam Airport.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 04.02.2020 1.

Issue notice.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent accepts notice.

2.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the petitioner be released on parole in order to enable the petitioner to seek medical treatment. It is stated that the petitioner had applied for parole on 06.01.2020, however, he has not received any communication from the respondent regarding the same.

3.

In view of the above, this Court considers it apposite to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's application and communicate its decision as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of two weeks from today. It is so directed.

4.

The petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. 5.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. VIBHU BAKHRU, J FEBRUARY 04, 2020 MK