Siesta Communications Private Limited v. Bharti Airtel Limited

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 265/2026 & I.A. 7854/2026 SIESTA COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tarun Sharma, Mr. Abid Ali, Mr.

Karrtik Sharma & Mr.

Manek Sharma, Advs.

versus BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

O R D E R

% 24.03.2026 1.

This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount involved is less than two crores.

3.

The original jurisdiction is not with this court. The application has to be made before the commercial court concerned. Reference in this regard be made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule & Ors. 2026 INSC 92.

4.

The petition is returned with liberty to file before the court concerned. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 24, 2026 'JK'

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 16:06:39