Kalpataru Projects Inderntaional Limited v. Indure Private Limted

$~37 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 181/2024, I.A. 5353/2024 KALPATARU PROJECTS INDERNTAIONAL LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Shamik S.

Sanjanwala, Mr.

Pranav Saigal, Ms. Anu tiwari and Mr. Shantanu Parmar, Advocates.

versus INDURE PRIVATE LIMTED ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ankit Anandraj Shah, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 06.03.2024 1.

A petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for extension of mandate of the learned Arbitrator by 18 months, to which learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.

2.

The record shows that the learned Arbitrator for the first time commenced the proceedings in August, 2016 after which there has been various dates and change of the learned Arbitrator by the Orders of the Apex Court dated 24.11.2020. Even thereafter, the matter has been going on. It is asserted that the matter is at the stage of respondents' evidence, therefore, time is sought for extension of the mandate by 18 months. 3.

Looking at the checkered history of the arbitration proceedings, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended by six months from the date of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2024 at 11:22:18

expiry i.e. 31.12.2023.

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 6, 2024/va The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2024 at 11:22:18