Kale Shivaji Baban v. Ranveer Singh@ Tinu Gujjar

$~30 & 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 33/2021 KALE SHIVAJI BABAN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Ms. Niyati Razdan and Mr.

Nikhil Palli, Advocates.

versus RANVEER SINGH@ TINU GUJJAR .....Respondent Through:

None + CRL.L.P. 34/2021 KALE SHIVAJI BABAN .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Ms. Niyati Razdan and Mr.

Nikhil Palli, Advocates.

versus RANVEER SINGH@ TINU GUJJAR .....Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 11.08.2025 1.

The present Criminal Leave Petitions under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, have been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, against the impugned Judgment dated 17.11.2020 of learned MM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case Nos. 9853/2018 and 9854/2018 respectively vide which the Respondent has been acquitted in the Complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

2.

In view of the Judgment of Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:20:06

2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 and Order of this Court in Crl.L.P.215/2021 dated 23.07.2025, the present matter are disposed of with direction that the present Petitions be treated as Appeals under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C and numbered accordingly.

3.

In case there is Application pending for Condonation of Delay, the same be also transferred along with the entire record to be considered by the learned ASJ in accordance with law.

4.

The Registry is directed to transfer entire record of the cases including the requisitioned copies of TCR, to the Learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi for marking it to the concerned Appellate Court/ learned ASJ, on 02.09.2025. 5.

The parties are directed to appear before the concerned learned Principal District & Sessions Judge on 02.09.2025. 6.

It is hereby, clarified that there are no observations as to the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the Court concerned.

7.

In view of the above, the present Appeals are disposed of along with the pending Application(s), if any.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 11, 2025/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:20:06