High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/72/2018

Sukhbir Sharma v. Uday Pratap Singh And ORS

2018-02-16Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao1 pages

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 72/2018 SUKHBIR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv.

versus UDAY PRATAP SINGH AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Adv.

Mr. Jawahar Raja, ASC for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 16.02.2018 Mr. Dhanesh Relan, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent / DDA states, status report has been filed in the Registry on February 15, 2018 with filing No. 51001. The same is not on record. Registry to place the same on record.

Mr. Relan has handed over to me a copy of the status report as filed on February 15, 2018 with filing no. 51001. He has drawn my attention to last paragraph of the status report. It is his submission, the allegation that the order dated May 25, 2017 has been violated is incorrect. In other words, respondents have not violated that order. The statement is taken on record. The contempt petition is closed.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J FEBRUARY 16, 2018/jg