← Library
High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/108/2020

Sindhu College Of Education v. Sanjay Awasthi & ANR

2020-03-11Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar2 pages

(p $~6&7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date ofDecision: 11.03.2020 + CONT.CAS(C) 1142/2019 M.R. TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Mayank Manish, Advs.

versus SANJAY AWASTHI & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel + CONT.CAS(C) 108/2020 SINDHU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ravi Kant & Mr. Mayank Manish, Advs.

versus SANJAY AWASTHI & ANR Respondents Through:

Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

JUDGMENT

D.N. PATEL. CHIEF JUSTICE (ORALI 1.

Before the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argued in detail, it has been fairly submitted by the counsel for respondents that the Com Cos. (C) 1142/2019 Com Cos. (C) 108/2020 Page I of2 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

applications of the original petitioners - M.R. Teacher training Institute and Sindhu College of Education are being processed and considered by the respondents without insisting for the No Objection Certificate in pursuance of our orders passed in W.P.(C) 5702/2019 and W.P.(C) 5888/2018 respectively. Photocopy of the minutes of 280"" meeting of Eastern Regional Committee - National Council for Teachers Education held on 29'^ February and E' March, 2020 in this regard are tendered to this Court for both the aforesaid institutions and the same are taken on record. 2.

In view of the minutes of the 280"^ meeting held on 29"" January and 1 March, 2020, there is no wilful disobedience by the respondents of the orders passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petitions. Hence, the contempt petitions are disposed of with direction to respondents to dispose of the applications of the petitioners in accordance with law without insisting for NOC as stated in their aforesaid minutes. CHIEF JUSTICE c.HAi^ijsiprNkAir MARCH 11,2020 ns Cont. Cos. (C) U 42/20! 9 & Cont. Cas. (C) 108/2020