Sonal Tanwar v. State & ANR

$~46.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 694/2020 SONAL TANWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Ajay Kumar, P.S. Rajouri Garden Mr. Mohit Singh G., Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 07.02.2020 CRL.M.A. 2861/2020 (Exemption) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application stand disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 694/2020 1.

The present proceedings are instituted seeking quashing of FIR No. 202/2017, under Section 380 IPC, registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi on the ground that parties have settled their disputes. 2.

The present FIR has been filed by respondent No.2 against the present petitioner who is his brother and who had stolen gold ornaments and some cash from his almirah.

3.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned APP for the State, submits that the charge sheet in the present case has been filed under the aforesaid section CRL.M.C. 694/2020

against the aforesaid petitioner and respondent No. 2 is the only complainant/victim.

4.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement out of court. In terms of the said settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim whatsoever against the petitioner. 5.

The petitioner and respondent No. 2, who are present in person, are identified by their respective counsels and the Investigating Officer. 6.

Respondent No. 2, present in Court, states that he has entered into the settlement with his own free will, volition and without any coercion. He further states that he has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

8.

The parties are bound by the statements made in Court today. 9.

In view of the above and the fact that the parties are brothers and have amicably settled their disputes, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid complaint case and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. 10.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. 11.

Order dasti to the counsels for the parties.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 07, 2020 na CRL.M.C. 694/2020