← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/1514/2020

Awadhesh Kumar v. Union Of India & ORS

2020-02-12Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Talwant Singh12 pages

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1514/2020 AWADHESH KUMAR .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr.

Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.

Amit Mehta, Government Pleader.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5237/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1514/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v.

Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1541/2020 NAKUL CHANDRA BEHERA .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr.

Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Yashish Chandra, Senior Panel Counsel and Rupal Kapoor, Government Pleader.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5378/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1541/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated

11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1543/2020 MANDAL BAYTULLA .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr.

Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Syed Adil Taqvi and Ms. Naghma Siddiqui, Advocates.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5380/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1543/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated

11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1607/2020 RAJ KUMAR YADAV .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr.

Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5641/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1607/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v.

Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc

$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1637/2020 AKHILESHWAR TIWARI .... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr.

Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5744/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1637/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v.

Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1609/2020 NIRAJ KUMAR RANJAN .... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Harish V. Shankar, CGSC with Ms. Gulabsa, Advocate.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 12.02.2020 CM APPL. 5644/2020 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1609/2020

2. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the Respondents.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C)

9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondent would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S.MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc