Subhash Chander v. State

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 405/2020 SUBHASH CHANDER ..... Petitioner Through:- Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocate on the panel of DHCLSC with petitioner in person.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:- Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing counsel with SI Lachman SIU-1/Crime Branch.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 18.02.2020 Vide this petition under Article 226 and 21 of Constitution of India r/w. Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months on medical grounds for treatment of his kidney problem. Ld. ASC states that the petitioner has not approached the Competent Authority first.

Heard.

Let the petitioner approach the Competent Authority first and in case, he is aggrieved by the order, he is at liberty to approach the Court. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. BRIJESH SETHI, J FEBRUARY 18, 2020 savita