← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2252/2026

Sh Shivam @ Goldi And ORS v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) And ANR

2026-03-27Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee3 pages

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2252/2026 SH SHIVAM @ GOLDI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through:

Ms. Kiran Pandey and Ms. Shweta Dixit, Advs. with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP with Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv.

Respondent no.2 present in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 27.03.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seeks quashing of FIR No.423/2023 dated 21.06.2023 registered at PS.: Jyoti Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (DP Act) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 30.08.2024 [Annexure P2] arrived between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Shahdara, KKD, Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 3.

Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 30.08.2024, whereby out of the total settlement amount of Rs.3,50,000/-, the petitioners have already paid her a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- and a Demand Draft dated 03.02.2026 bearing No.966184 of Rs.1,00,000/- (Indian Bank, Allahabad) has been handed over in Court to her today as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. Respondent no.2 further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995 vide Decree dated 22.11.2024, and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

4.

The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO. 5.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the parties and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s). In view thereof, the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

6.

Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.423/2023 dated 21.06.2023 registered at PS.: Jyoti Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and under Sections 3/4 of the DP Act and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 7.

Accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MARCH 27, 2026/Ab The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.