Rinku Rathi @ Rinku Chaudhary v. State

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 499/2019 RINKU RATHI @ RINKU CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, PS Crime Branch.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 28.02.2019 This is the second anticipatory bail application. There is no new ground to entertain the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner claims that in the earlier anticipatory bail application complete documents could not be filed. The non-filing of the documents by the petitioner is no new ground to entertain the second anticipatory bail application. Petition is dismissed.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 'yo'