Sh Vikas Kumar & ANR. v. The State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~75 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ SH VIKAS KUMAR & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh with Mr. Firoz Khan and Mr. Amit Rana, Advocates.

P-1 in court.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Umang Gahlwat, P.S.:

Kashmiri Gate.

R-2 in-person.

Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate for Complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 30.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 9413/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.

By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and father-in-law of the complainant (respondent No.2), seek quashing of case FIR No. 142/2024 dated 09.03.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') at P.S.: Kashmeri Gate, North District, Delhi.

2.

The petition is premised on Compromise Deed attested on 23.03.2026, whereby the petitioners and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioners, as also of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4.

Petitioner No.1 as well as respondent No. 2 are present in court. The credentials of parties have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. Since petitioner No.2 is stated to be in Bihar, without access to internet facility, his appearance before the court is exempted.

5.

The parties have confirmed that one child was born from the wedlock, who is minor as of date.

6.

The parties are stated to have resolved all their disputes amicably; and in view of the settlement, respondent No.2 has re-joined the company of petitioner No. 1 and they have been living together since, alongwith their child.

7.

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

8.

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 9.

Accordingly, case FIR No. 142/2024 dated 09.03.2024 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC at P.S.: Kashmiri Gate, North The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

District, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

10. Petition stands disposed-of.

11. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 30, 2026 ds The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.