Aditya Kumar Mishra v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~92 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1660/2020 ADITYA KUMAR MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Naushad Alam and Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.

Gaurav Verma, Sr.

Panel Counsel, and Ms. Rupali Kapoor, Government Pleader.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 13.02.2020 C.M. APPL. 5789/2020 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1660/2020

2. Notice. Learned counsel for the Respondents accepts notice.

3. Subject to the Respondents verifying the details, the prayers in the present petition stand covered by the decisions dated 9th January, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 (Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India); decision dated 11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India).

4. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Respondents to grant the Petitioner, upon verification, pro rata pension from the dates that he was discharged from service, with arrears being paid to the Petitioner not later than 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondents would be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the said sum for the period of delay.

5. The petition is disposed of with above directions. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 13, 2020 abc