Amna Khatoon v. The State ( NCT Of Delhi) & ORS

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 195/2016 AMNA KHATOON ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. M. A. Rahman, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

..... Respondents Through : Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.

Amrit Singh and Tushar, Advocates, Inspector Arvind Kumar and SI Uma Dutt, PS-Mangolpuri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 23.05.2016 Present petitioner has been filed by the petitioner under Section 226 and 227 of Constitution of India seeking production of his daughter Parveen, who is missing since 04.09.2015.

Ms. Parveen has been produced in Court today. Parveen and Rinku submit that their marriage was solemnized in December, 2015. Parveen is stated to be on family way. Rinku and his Chacha (uncle) are present in Court. Rinku submits that he shall remain fully responsible for the well being of Parveen i.e. his wife and his family members have also accepted their marriage. He has no objection if Parveen continues to maintain relations with her family member and talks to them on phone and meets them.

Parveen submits that she is not willing to join the company of her parents. As per school certificate, Parveen is major.

At this stage in view of the statement made by Parveen, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner who is present in court does not wish to press the present petition. Accordingly, present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J MAY 23, 2016 gr