Sh Kamru Jamal v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS.
$~104 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2357/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9723/2026 SH KAMRU JAMAL .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Sunil Rai, Advocate via videoconferencing. Petitioner in person.
versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State.
Respondents Nos. 2 & 3 in person.
WSI Anjali, P.S. Kanjhawala.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 30.03.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 222/2018 dated 03.07.2018 registered under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') at P.S.: Kanjhawala, Outer District Delhi.
2.
The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding ('MoU') dated 03.12.2025, whereby the petitioner and respondents Nos. 2 and 3 have resolved the matter amicably.
3.
The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4.
The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.
CRL.M.C. 2357/2026 Page 1 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:45:44
5.
The court has interacted with the respondents, as also with petitioner, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and MoU dated 03.12.2025 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward. 6.
Mr. Shoaib Haider, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.
7.
In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.
Accordingly, case FIR No. 222/2018 dated 03.07.2018 registered under section 326 of the IPC at P.S.: Kanjhawala, Outer District Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 9.
Petition stands disposed-of.
10.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 30, 2026 V.Rawat CRL.M.C. 2357/2026 Page 2 of 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 12:45:44