Ramesh @ Dudhiya v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1029/2026 RAMESH @ DUDHIYA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Shannu Baghel with Mr.

Saksham Kumar, Ms.

Shambhavi, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State.

SI Pancham, P.S.: Sarai Rohilla.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 04.04.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks emergency parole for 03 weeks on the ground that his nephew has met with a serious road accident on 25.03.2026 and has been admitted to the hospital in critical condition.

2.

The petition narrates that the nephew is undergoing treatment at a hospital in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh.

3.

Notice on this petition was issued on 30.03.2026. 4.

Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) appearing for the State has handed-up a copy of Status Report dated 03.04.2026. The same is taken on record.

5.

The status report records, that after undergoing treatment at the hospital in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, the petitioner's nephew was discharged in stable condition on 30.03.2026. Furthermore, on instructions of the W.P.(CRL) 1029/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:31:02

Investigating Officer ('I.O.') who is present in court, Mr. Lao submits, that the I.O. has been informed on a telephonic conversation, that after his discharge from hospital in Meerut, the petitioner's nephew is now in the care of his family in Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh, where the aunt of the injured resides.

6.

The petitioner is serving life sentence for the offences under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 in case FIR No.289/2006 registered at P.S.: Sarai Rohilla, Delhi.

7.

Upon a conspectus of the foregoing facts and circumstances, this court is of the view, that other things apart, the ground cited for seeking emergency parole, namely that the petitioner's nephew has suffered an accident is too remote for the prayer to be allowed, especially since the nephew is now in the care of his family in Baghpat, Uttar Pradesh. 8.

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

9.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 4, 2026 ds W.P.(CRL) 1029/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2026 at 13:31:02