← Library
High Court of DelhiCONT.CAS(C)/371/2025

Gautam Boudh v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ORS.

2025-03-11Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh Sharma2 pages

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 371/2025 GAUTAM BOUDH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Harsh Kumar, Mr. Hemang and Mr. Abdul Hameed Khan, Advs.

versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Mr. Sachin Singh Shahi, Mrs. Shashi Gupta and Mr. Arnav Gupta, Advs. for R-1/MCD Counsel for Respondent/STF (appearance not given) Ms. Mrinalini Sen and Ms.

Lucy, Advs. for R-4/DDA

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

O R D E R

% 11.03.2025 1.

This hearing is being conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 14481/2025 (for exemption) & CM APPL. 14482/2025 (for exemption) 2.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

3.

The applications stand disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 371/2025 4.

The Petitioner is seeking initiation of the contempt proceedings against the Respondents for the alleged wilful defiance contained in the Order dated 24.12.2024 in W.P. (C) No. 17976/2024, passed by The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2025 at 11:06:31

this Court.

5.

Learned counsels for the Respondents are present on advance notice.

6.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for respondent no. 2/ Special Task Force ['STF'] that the matter is under examination with the STF.

7.

Insofar as, learned counsel for respondent No.1/MCD is concerned, it is stated that the building is constructed on the plot measuring 75 sq. yards pursuant to a sanctioned plan and on the directions passed by this Court, the site was inspected and certain deviations have been informed. It is stated that the Show Cause Notice dated 09.03.2015 has already been issued to the occupier of the premises, and the MCD is taking appropriate action in accordance with the law.

8.

Accordingly, nothing survives in the present contempt petition. Moreover, it appears that the Petitioner has no locus-standi as he is residing far away from the place in question. Nothing is explained in the present contempt petition as to how is the Petitioner affected by any action or inaction on the part of the Respondents. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. However, the Respondents shall proceed in accordance with the law.

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

MARCH 11, 2025 Sp/ss The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2025 at 11:06:31