Rajesh Kumar Jain v. Tata Teleservices Ltd.

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 208/2024 RAJESH KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Deepak Kr. Agarwal and Mr.

Vikas Pal, Advocates.

versus TATA TELESERVICES LTD.

..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Mansoor Ali Shoket, Mr. Nitin Kala, Mr. Kunal Singh, Mr. Tanmay Jain and Ms.

Kanishka Rawat, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 15.03.2024 I.A. 5848/2024 (Exemption) 1.

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The application stands disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 208/2024 3.

The petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator by three months w.e.f. 21.02.2024. 4.

The mandate of the learned Arbitrator has last expired on 21.02.2024. 5.

Considering the submissions made and on the request of the parties, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended by four months from the date of the mandate expired.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2024 at 11:32:39

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 15, 2024/RS The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2024 at 11:32:39