Aamir Ansari Through His Father v. Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS

$~84 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4174/2026 & CM APPL. 20387/2026 AAMIR ANSARI THROUGH HIS FATHER .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary Mr. Gufran Ali Mr. Sadik Mr. Wahab Ali Choudhary, Advs.

versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through:

Mr Dhruv Rohatgi Panel Counsel GNCTD Ms Chandrika Sachdeva Mr Dhruv Kumar, Advs.

Mr. Rizwan, Adv. for R2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 06.04.2026 CM APPL. 20388/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4174/2026 1.

The order is being passed in continuation to the order dated 01.04.2026. 2.

The notice was issued on 01.04.2026.

3.

The facts are that the petitioner applied for admission in Class 9th in the respondent No.2 school through its online portal and submitted his documents on 09.03.2026 for the same. The petitioner has also paid the admission fee of Rs. 66,650/-.

4.

Mr. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner was not permitted to attend the classes. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:20:16

5.

Mr. Rizwan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 states that the parents of the petitioner misbehaved with the staff of the respondent No.2 school and hence, the respondent No. 2 cancelled the admission of the petitioner on 16.03.2026.

6.

After some arguments, both the parties have arrived at a settlement as under:- i.

The petitioner shall be permitted to participated in the academic curriculum including attending of classes and preparing for the exams.

ii.

In order to ensure smooth schooling for the petitioner, the parents of the petitioner undertake that they shall not, without admitting that they had misbehaved, misbehave with any of the staff of the respondent No. 2 school.

iii.

The petitioner's parents shall also give an unconditional apology in favour of the respondent No. 2 school. 7.

In case there is any incidence of misbehaviour by the parents of the petitioner in future, the respondent No. 2 shall be entitled to initiate appropriate legal action. Similarly, if there is any violation on behalf of the respondent No. 2, the petitioner shall also be entitled to avail their legal rights.

8.

Consequently, the letter dated 23.03.2026 is set aside. 9.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J APRIL 6, 2026 / (MS) The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:20:16