Rajdeep Mahila Mahavidyalaya v. National Council For Teacher Education And ANR.
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1924/2020 RAJDEEP MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr. Mayank Manish with Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates.
versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through:
Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing counsel with Ms. Niharika Rai and Ms. Ankita, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
% 19.02.2020 1.
Issue notice to the respondents.
2.
Ms. Arunima Dwivedi accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
3.
Mr. Mayank Manish submits that the issue raised in the captioned petition is covered by the judgment of this Court rendered on 08.01.2020 in a batch of writ petitions, the lead petition being W.P. (C) 12307/2019, titled Shri Vinayak Mahavidyalaya Vs. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr. 4.
A copy of the order is appended on page 39 of the paper book and is marked as Annexure-P4.
W.P.(C) 1924/2020
5.
Ms. Dwivedi, who, appears on advance notice on behalf of the respondents affirms this position.
6.
To be noted, the substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows:- " a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Directions for processing the application of the Petitioner institution seeking recognition for the ITEP course; b. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Directions to NCTE to re-accept the processing fee or any other details as desired;"
7.
Accordingly, the prayers made in the writ petition are allowed. 8.
The directions contained in the aforementioned judgment will apply mutatis mutandis to the captioned petition as well. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 19, 2020 c W.P.(C) 1924/2020