Nirmal Singh Lamba v. Gagan Preet Singh & ANR.

3.

$-68, 69 & *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1207/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4722/2019 NIRMAL SINGH LAMBA Petitioner Through:

Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate versus S P REALTORS Respondent Through:

Mr. Lavnish Kumar, Advocate + CRL.M.C. 1225/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4781/2019 NIRMAL SINGH LAMBA Petitioner Through:

Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate versus GAGAN PREET SINGH & ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr. Lavnish Kumar, Advocate + X CRL.M.C. 1203/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4713/2019 NIRMAL SINGH LAMBA Petitioner Through:

Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate versus HARLEEN KAUR SACHDEVA & ANR.

Respondents Through:

Mr. Lavnish Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

ORDER

% 23.09.2019 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

CRL.M.As. 4723/2019 & 4782/2019 (Exemption^ Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 1207/2019. CRL.M.C. 1225/2019 & CRT .M.r. 1203/2019 Learned counsel for the respondent states at bar that the petitioner did not issue cheque in question. He was not even director at the time of the issuance of cheque. However, inadvertently he is impleaded as party in the complaint pending before the trial court.

Keeping in view the averments made in the present petition and the concession granted by the learned counsel for the respondent, I hereby quash the complaint and consequent proceedings emanating thereto. The petition is accordingly allowed.

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 V