Akash & ORS. v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi Through Sho & ORS.

$~94 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2482/2026 AKASH & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Petitioners in-person.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Gaurav, P.S.: Anand Parbat.

Mr. Diwakar Chaudhary, Advocate for the private respondents.

R-2, 3 and 4 in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 02.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10103/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.

CRL.M.C. 2482/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners and complainants/respondents Nos. 2, 3, and 4 seek quashing of case FIR No.

212/2019 dated 17.09.2019 registered under sections 323/354B/452/506/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') at P.S.: Anand Parbat, Central District, Delhi. Consequent upon completion of investigation, offences under sections 325/354 were added vidé charge-sheet dated 06.08.2021.

CRL.M.C. 2482/2026 Page 1 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

2.

The petition is premised on Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 18.12.2025, whereby the petitioners and respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4 have resolved the matter amicably.

3.

The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners and of respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4.

4.

The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

5.

The court has interacted with respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4, as also with petitioners, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 18.12.2025 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward.

6.

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

7.

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.

Accordingly, case FIR No. 212/2019 dated 17.09.2019 registered under sections 323/354B/452/506/509/34 of the IPC at P.S.: Anand CRL.M.C. 2482/2026 Page 2 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Parbat, Central District, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

9.

Petition stands disposed-of.

10.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 2, 2026 ds CRL.M.C. 2482/2026 Page 3 of 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.