High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/1993/2020

Vandana Sharma And ANR. v. Union Of India And ORS.

2020-02-24Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A. K. Chawla2 pages

$~51 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

..... Petitioners Through Mr. A.K. Singhla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Bhuvan Ravindran, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, SCGC for R-1.

Mrs.

Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD (Services) with Mr.

N.K. Singh, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 24.02.2020 CM APPL. 7006/2020 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 1993/2020 & CM APPL. 7005/2020 (Directions) During the course of hearing, Ms. Ahlawat, ld. Standing Counsel for the respondent - Govt. of NCT of Delhi submits that the petitioners may make a detailed representation to espouse their cause and that representation can be considered on its own merits and decided in a time bound manner. Mr. Singhla, ld. Senior Counsel for the petitioners on instructions agrees thereto.

Taking note of the submissions made, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction that on the petitioners' making a detailed representation to the Principal Secretary (Health), Govt. of NCT of Delhi within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered on its own merits and a decision

taken by way of a speaking order within eight weeks thereafter, and, communicated to the petitioners. It goes without saying, if, the petitioners are aggrieved of such decision, the liberty is reserved to them to agitate their rights, if any, in accordance with law.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

A. K. CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 24, 2020 acm