Satish Hooda & ANR. v. Sho & ORS.

$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3982/2024 & CM APPL. 16309/2024 SATISH HOODA & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate.

versus SHO & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocate for R1 to 4 & 6. Mr. Udit Malik, ASC with Mr. Vishal Chanda, Advocate.

W/SI Menka, PS Chhawla.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 15.03.2024 1.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to institute a suit by making appropriate prayers for injunction to demonstrate that the boundary wall which has been constructed is within the boundary of the Petitioner and for which purpose permission from the municipal authorities is not required. 2.

Permission and liberty, as prayed for, is granted. 3.

It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.

4.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn along with pending application(s), if any.

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J MARCH 15, 2024 hsk The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 19:51:55