Parvez Ahmed v. Wasim Ahmed And Another
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 393/2025 PARVEZ AHMED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Dashmesh Tripathi, Advocate.
versus WASIM AHMED AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, SC for R-1 with Mr. Sanjeet Kumar and Mr. Adarsh, Advocates.
Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr.
Shashank Singh, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 18.12.2025 1.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.
The present petition under Articles 11/12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, seeks the following prayers:- "(a) Appropriate orders/directions, directing the respondents to appear in person before this Hon'ble Court to explain their conduct in not complying with the order/directions given in the judgment dated 10.12.2024 passed in the W.P.(C) No.17090/2024 and thereafter take suitable action against them.
(b) Appropriate orders/ directions directing the respondents to pay the costs of this petition to the petitioner.
(c) Such other or further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice." 3.
Vide judgment dated 10.12.2024 in W.P.(C) No.17090/2024, the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2025 at 14:20:18
learned Single Judge of this Court had passed the following directions:- "12. For all the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is allowed directing Respondents to convene a DPC for promotion to the post of Vice Principal in the School as expeditiously as possible and not later than 03 months from today. Needless to state that if the Petitioner has any surviving grievance, he will be at liberty to take recourse to legal remedies available to him."
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 submits that the aforesaid direction has been complied with, and DPC has been convened. 5.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner confirms the same, and in view of the aforesaid, does not wish to press the present petition. 6.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. 7.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J DECEMBER 18, 2025/sn/db The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2025 at 14:20:18