Kishan Kumar & ANR. v. State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2588/2026, CRL.M.A. 10517/2026 KISHAN KUMAR & ANR.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Nikhil Pillai and Mr. Abhiroop Saha, Advs. with petitioners in person.

versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates with SI Deepak Kumar, PS.:

R-2 present in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 07.04.2026 1.

By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No. 920/2024 dated 24.12.2024 registered at PS.: Jahangir Puri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure P6), whereby the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have mutually and amicably resolved their disputes. 2.

Issue notice.

3.

Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

4.

Respondent nos.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 20.05.2025, in compliance whereof the petitioners have already paid respondent no.2 the total settlement amount of Rs. 50,000/-, as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. Respondent no.2 further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995 vide Decree dated 25.10.2025, and as such, she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. 5.

The petitioners and the respondent nos.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials as on record, have been identified by the Investigating Officer.

6.

Facts disclose that a settlement has already been arrived voluntarily between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 and the present petition is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, they shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived inter se themselves. As such, following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the aforesaid FIR against the petitioners will be an exercise in futility. 7.

Thus, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 920/2024 dated 24.12.2024 registered at PS.: Jahangir Puri, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

hereby quashed.

8.

Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

APRIL 07, 2026/NA The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.