Karan Luthra v. Income Tax Officer

$~58 to 60 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1069/2020, CRL.M.As.4250-51/2020 KARAN LUTHRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J. S. Bakshi with Mr. A. S.

Bakshi, Advs.

versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Deepak Anand, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Vipul Agarwal, Adv.

+ CRL.M.C. 1070/2020, CRL.M.As.4252-53/2020 KARAN LUTHRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J. S. Bakshi with Mr. A. S.

Bakshi, Advs.

versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Deepak Anand, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Vipul Agarwal, Adv.

+ CRL.M.C. 1072/2020, CRL.M.As.4255-56/2020 KARAN LUTHRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. J. S. Bakshi with Mr. A. S.

Bakshi, Advs.

versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Through Mr. Deepak Anand, Sr.

Adv. with Mr. Vipul Agarwal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 25.02.2020 Undisputed fact is that NBW has not been issued against petitioner till date and application for cancellation of the said order is pending before Trial Court.

Keeping in view the age of petitioner and that the case is compoundable, Trial Court is directed to pass order on the application filed by petitioner but no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner. Accordingly, it is made clear that if petitioner fails to appear on subsequent dates then Trial Court may take strict action against petitioner as per law.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J FEBRUARY 25, 2020 ms