Smt Savita Chaudhary v. Uco Bank Limited

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3407/2025 SMT SAVITA CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through:

None.

versus UCO BANK LIMITED .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

O R D E R

% 05.02.2026 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari, directing the respondent/Bank not to take any coercive action against the property of the petitioner which has been mortgaged by the husband to the bank. 2.

The matter is called out in the revised call. 3.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that account of the husband of the petitioner and the petitioner has been settled on 04.07.2025 with the Bank and closed thereafter. He submits that nothing further survives in the present petition.

5.

The statement of learned counsel for the respondent is taken on record.

6.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 5, 2026/r/nc The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/02/2026 at 13:18:47