Madan Chander Dass v. State

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 111/2018 MADAN CHANDER DASS .....Appellant Through:

Counsel for appellant with appellant in person.

versus STATE .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with Ms. Yusra, Advocate with SI Vishnu Singh PS Badarpur, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 11.12.2025 1.

At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the appellant has already undergone his entire sentence and has also made the part-payment of fine. He further, upon instructions from the appellant, who is present in the Court and is duly identified by the IO, states that having understood the consequences, the appellant does not wish to press the present appeal on merits. The appellant has handed over his gate-pass, which is taken on record.

2.

The nominal roll of the appellant is on record, as per which the appellant was released on 11.06.2020, after completion of his sentence and payment of part-fine amount. Learned APP for the State submits that the appellant has undergone the default sentence as well as the remaining proportionate default sentence on account of non-payment of part amount of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2025 at 12:28:45

fine.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal stands disposed of as not pressed.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J DECEMBER 11, 2025/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2025 at 12:28:45