Anupam Bajaj v. Vijay Kumar Sharma

$~90 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 249/2025 ANUPAM BAJAJ .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.

versus VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Himanshu Bodwal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 20.03.2025 I.A. 7157/2025 1.

Exemption is granted subject to all just exceptions. 2.

The applicant(s) shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules before the next date of hearing. 3.

The application is disposed of.

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 249/2025 4.

This is a petition filed under Section 29A (4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of 3 months.

5.

It is stated that the parties have already addressed arguments and now the Award is reserved.

6.

For the said reasons, issue notice. Mr. Bodwal, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and has no objection to the petition being allowed. 7.

I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown. 8.

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the mandate of the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 14:36:40

Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of 3 months from today. 9.

The period from 13.03.2025 till today stands regularized. 10.

The petition is disposed of.

JASMEET SINGH, J MARCH 20, 2025/DM Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2025 at 14:36:40