Prakash S. Tewani & ORS v. The State And ANR

$~2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 207/2016 & CRL.M.A. 1129/2016 PRAKASH S. TEWANI & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through :Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. Kunal Bahri, Advs.

versus THE STATE AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through :Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with SI Kamal Kumar Yadav, P.S. OIA, New Delhi for respondent no. 1 Mr. Milan Deep Singh, Adv. for respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 17.11.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for quashing of the FIR. Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that closure report has already been filed in the court of concerned Metropolitan Magistrate. In view of this statement of learned Additional Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners has not pressed this petition at this stage. Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed at this stage. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

NOVEMBER 17, 2016/rb