Jai Ram Alais Jai Ram Sharma v. State NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

$~105 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2230/2024, CRL.M.A. 8629/2024, CRL.M.A. 8630/2024, CRL.M.A. 8631/2024 JAI RAM ALAIS JAI RAM SHARMA &Ors .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Parteek Khera, Advocates with petitioner in person.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with Insp. Naveen Kumar, P.S.

Samaypur Badli.

Mr. Jay Prakash Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 19.03.2024 1.

The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 720/2020 registered under Sections 323/325/354/354B/509/34 IPC at P.S. Samaypur Badli, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes. 2.

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, on 19.10.2020, the petitioners hurled abuses, misbehaved and even gave fist blows to the complainant leading to injury.

3.

Mr. Jha, learned APP for the State, on instructions, submits that the petitioners are the only accused persons and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim in the present case.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and respondent No. 2 are known to each other and present FIR was registered due to some misunderstanding and with the intervention of family members and friends, parties have amicably settled their disputes vide Compromise Deed dated 02.12.2023, a copy of which has been placed on record. In terms of the said settlement, complainant is now left with no claim or grievance against the petitioners.

5.

The petitioners and respondent No.2, who are present in Court, have been identified by their respective counsel as well as the I.O./Insp. Naveen Kumar, P.S. Samaypur Badli. Petitioners have shown remorse for their conduct and undertake not to repeat the same in future. 6.

Respondent No. 2 states that she has entered into the settlement with the petitioners out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed.

7.

The parties shall remain bound by the statements made in Court today.

8.

In view of the above facts and considering that no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.20,000/- to be paid by each of the petitioners out of which Rs.10,000/- each shall be paid to respondent No.2 and remaining Rs.10,000/- shall be deposited with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority within a period of four weeks from today. The amount so deposited shall be utilized by the DSLSA for providing counselling/psychological support to POCSO victims requiring such The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

assistance.

9.

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. as well as in Court failing which, the Registry shall list the matter in the Court. 10.

A copy of this order be communicated to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority for intimation. 11.

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous applications.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 19, 2024 ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.