Mohd. Sahid v. State

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 291/2017 MOHD. SAHID ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Adv. from legal aid.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC and Ms.

Srilina Roy, Adv. with SI Kali Charan PS Ashok Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.03.2017 Petitioner seeks parole on the ground of filing SLP and for maintaining social ties with the family and society. Address of petitioner has been verified. It is trite law that every convict is entitled to exhaust all the legal remedies, as may be available to him upto the highest forum. Petitioner is in incarceration for about 8 years. A convict, who is in long incarceration, if released on parole once in a year, it aids to his physical and mental well being. Petitioner was released on parole last year. It is not the case that he has misused the concession of parole granted to him. Keeping in mind the totality of the circumstances, it is ordered that petitioner be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of

his release, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent. During the parole period, petitioner shall report to the SHO of the concerned police station once in a week, that is, on every Monday at 10:00 am and shall also give his contact number to the SHO. On completion of parole period, petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

MARCH 10, 2017/dk