Shyam Lal v. State

$~73.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 292/2017 SHYAM LAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel and Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Advocate along with ASI Tej Ram, PS-Najafgarh, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 27.01.2017 The petitioner has preferred this petition to seek parole. However, the nominal roll on record shows that the petitioner has been granted furlough for a period of 3 weeks vide order dated 17.11.2016, which till date has not been availed of.

In view of the aforesaid, this petition has been dismissed. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 27, 2017 B.S. Rohella