Mahesh Chandra Maurya v. New Delhi Municipal Council & ANR.

$~106 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4184/2024 & CM APPL. 17117/2024 MAHESH CHANDRA MAURYA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. G.S Chaturvedi, Mr. Mahesh Maurya, Mr. Virat Singh and Mr.

Ashok Choudhary, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.

Chetanya Singh, Standing Counsel for NDMC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R

% 06.05.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode) 1.

In terms of the previous directions, learned counsel appearing for the respondent NDMC submits that though in the initial vacancy circular, the age limit was stipulated as 'not more than 70 years', however, by a corrigendum dated 16.10.2023, the age limited prescribed was reduced to 65 years instead of 70 years. The photocopies of Vacancy Circular as also the Corrigendum have been handed over the bench. The same are taken on record.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that since the petitioner is admittedly 67 years as on the date of the consideration, the petitioner's application could not be considered for further processing. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:57:33

3.

In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 4.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition alongwith pending application is dismissed as withdrawn. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J MAY 6, 2024 Aj The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/05/2024 at 11:57:33