Azarudden v. Brahmi Devi & ORS

$~24 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 279/2020 AZARUDDEN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Yogesh Swaroop, Mr.Kapil K.

Kaushik, Advocates versus BRAHMI DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Rajeev M. Roy, Mr.P. Srinivasan, Advocates for respondent No.4

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

O R D E R

% 02.03.2020 CM APPL.8319/2020 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM(M) 279/2020 1.

The petitioner has challenged the order dated 13th January, 2020 whereby the Claims Tribunal has impleaded the petitioner as a party. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased, Raj Kumar was the registered owner of the offending vehicle at the time of the accident and therefore, the petitioner is not a necessary party. 3.

Learned Claims Tribunal held that the petitioner admitted during the course of the hearing that the petitioner had lodged NCR dated 08th November, 2011 with respect to the theft of RC, permit, fitness, insurance and other documents relating to the offending vehicle from which it was evident that the petitioner was in possession of the offending vehicle prior to the accident.

4.

There is no infirmity in the impugned order.

The petition is dismissed.

J.R. MIDHA, J.

MARCH 02, 2020/dk By:RAJENDER SINGH KARKI 13:33:47