← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./347/2018

Geeta v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

2018-03-19Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva3 pages

Ii $1 &2 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

± CRL.M.C. 347/2018 GEETA Petitioner LI versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent + CRL.M.C. 352/2018 S TARA DEVI & ORS Petitioners Through versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr Lal Bahadur Sahu, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr Akshai Malik, Addi. PP for the State.

SI Raghu Raj Singh, PS Mandawali.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

% 19.03.2018 CRL.M.C. 347/2018 & Crl.M.A.1337/201 8(stay) CRL.M.C.352/201 8 & CrI.M.A.1371/201 8(stay) 1..

Petitioners in Crl.M.C. No.347/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.548/2017 under Sections 323/3541354(B)/34 IPC, Police Station Mandavali.

2.

Petitioners in Crl.M.C. No.352/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.547/2017 under Sections 323/354/354(B)/34 IPC, Police Station Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

Crl.M.C.347/2018 & 352/2018

Mandavali.

The subject FIRs are cross-FIRS. FIRs have been registered, as a consequence to a quarrel which took place between the parties. The parties are stated to be neighbours. Parties have since settled their dispute with the intervention of respectable members of the Society, relatives and with a view to restore peace and harmony between them and' the locality.

Settlement Agreement dated 23.12.2017 has been executed between the parties. Parties are present in person.. They are represented by their respective counsels and identified by the Investigating Officer. They confirm that that the settlement has taken place and further that they do not wish to press her complaint any further. In view of the above and keeping in view of the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute with the intervention of respectable members of the Society with a view to restore peace and harmony between them and a Settlement Agreement dated 23.12.2017 has been executed between the parties, and further they do not wish to press. charges against each other, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

Cri.M.C.347/2018 & 352/2018

Accordingly, No. 548/2017 under Sections 323/354/354(B)/34 IPC, Police Station Mandavali, and FR No. 547/2017 under Sections 323/354/354(B)/34 IPC, Police Station Mandavali, and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 8.

Order Dasti under signatures of Court Master. SA1JEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH 19,2018 Crl.M.C.347/2018&352/2018