Sailja Singh v. Rajkumar Sharma@Raju & ORS.

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 212/2024 SAILJA SINGH .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Rishabh Kapur and Mr. Tanmay Gupta, Advocates versus RAJKUMAR SHARMA@RAJU & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Md. Israr Khan, Advocate for R-5

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 20.01.2026 CM APPL. 3724/2026 1.

Application under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for refund of the Court fees.

2.

It is submitted that Section 13 of the Court Fees Act provides that in case a plaint, which is rejected by the Trial Court is remanded in Appeal, the certificate for refund of the Court Fee or the Memorandum of Appeal may be issued.

3.

Reliance is also placed on Nilesh Girkar v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited and Ors, 2025 SCC OnLine Del 9618. Submissions heard.

4.

Vide Order dated 12.01.2026, the Order of the learned Trial Court rejecting the Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been set aside and the case has been remanded back.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:12:38

5.

In view of the Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, Certificate may be issued for refund of the Court fee annexed on the Memorandum of Appeal. 6.

Application accordingly stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 20, 2026 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:12:38