M/S Pp Jewellers Pvt Ltd v. M/S P.P. Buildwell (P) Ltd

$~7.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 210/2011 M/S PP JEWELLERS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through:

versus M/S P.P. BUILDWELL (P) LTD ..... Defendant Through:

Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 11.03.2016 Despite pass over, none appears for the plaintiff. The order sheet shows that counsel for the plaintiff had sought discharge in the matter and was discharged on 21.12.2015. Even on the said date, no other counsel had appeared for the plaintiff. There was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff even on 03.02.2016. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in pursuing the suit. The same is, accordingly, dismissed in default. VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 11, 2016 sr