Dr. Onkari Prasad v. Union Of India And ANR.

$~4(2021) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decision delivered on: 08.11.2021 + W.P.(C) 2444/2020 DR. ONKARI PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr .M K Bhardwaj with Ms. Ridam Arora, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr.

Kavindra Gill, GP for Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] 1.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.02.2019, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short, "the Tribunal"] in O.A. No. 1762/2015.

2.

The aforesaid O.A. was dismissed by the Tribunal, via a cryptic order, in view of their reading of the matter; which was, that the issue which arose in the O.A., was similar to the one which arose for consideration in O.A. No. 1229/2016.

2.1. To be noted, O.A. No. 1229/2016 was dismissed by the Tribunal, vide order dated 30.11.2018 [sic 30.10.2018].

2.2.

Against the aforementioned order dated 30.10.2018, a writ petition has been filed before us, which is listed today and is numbered as W.P.(C) RANI W.P.(C) 2444/2020 Page 1 of 2

No. 3213/2019.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties submit that, the facts obtaining in W.P.(C) No. 3213/2019 are different, and therefore, the matter at hand would have to be decided on merits.

4.

As indicated above, there is no discussion on merits in the impugned order passed by the Tribunal .

4.1.

Therefore, the impugned order passed by the Tribunal is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Tribunal, for fresh adjudication, albeit on the merits of the matter.

4.2. Needless to add, both sides will be given due opportunity, to place their respective stands before the Tribunal. 5.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TALWANT SINGH, J NOVEMBER 8, 2021/mr Click here to check corrigendum, if any RANI W.P.(C) 2444/2020 Page 2 of 2