Surendar v. State

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 628/2020 SURENDAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr K. Singhal, Ms Pratiksha Tripathi, Mr Prasanna and Mr Chetan Bhardwaj, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr Divyank Tyagi, Advocate for Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.), GNCTD.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 10.08.2020 [Hearing held through video conferencing] CRL.M.A. 10676/2020 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.A. 10675/2020 2.

The petitioner has filed the present application contending that the order dated 04.03.2020 has not been complied with. Mr Tyagi, learned counsel appearing for the State seeks time to take instructions in this regard. 3.

List on 24.08.2020.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J AUGUST 10, 2020/MK Signed By:DUSHYANT RAWAL Location:

22:11:59